As private investment in infrastructure increases and catastrophes highlight the exposure, demand for CECR insurance continues to grow. We review the main features and important requirements for risk assumption.
Major earthquake and flood events from recent years have highlighted the exposure potential of infrastructure to natural hazards. Accidents, such as collision or explosion, can be equally destructive. Civil Engineering Completed Risks (CECR) insurance protects completed infrastructure against these and other risks. This article reviews CECR, including important underwriting considerations from PartnerRe’s facultative engineering team.
A growing line
Demand for CECR is on the increase as a consequence of the ever greater involvement of private investment in infrastructure, together with higher risk awareness and other factors such as climate change. This is an insurance cover with continued growth potential, but where particular care is needed given the high exposures involved, risk of anti-selection and multi-disciplinary expertise required for risk evaluation.
CECR is an annually renewable insurance for completed civil engineering structures, in most cases where fire is not the predominant exposure. It primarily covers massive concrete structures, e.g. roads, tunnels, bridges, dams, canals, harbours, transmission lines and runways, as opposed to manufacturing or residential/commercial facilities. See figures 1 and 2.
CECR indemnifies the insured for repair/replacement costs following unforeseen and sudden material loss or damage to the insured property. The cover was initially offered only on a “named perils” basis, but is now also available on an “all risks” basis, depending on the market and/or market cycle. Natural catastrophe events are generally considered to be the main risk, although some structures, e.g. tunnels, are highly exposed to fire. Many contracts are now extended to include consequential loss (business interruption).
Insureds for this class of business are typically public authorities, joint ventures, public private partnerships (PPPs), private finance initiative (PFI) contractors and other investors. Ownership can be complex and must be clearly specified. Insurers and reinsurers support this cover principally through a mix of coinsurance and facultative and treaty reinsurance structures, varying substantially by risk and market.
Scope of cover
For a named perils cover, the usual perils are:
The cover may be extended to include:
CECR all risk covers usually specify exclusions. Standard exclusions include:
For risks that are transferred from the engineering project phase to the operational phase, the project sum insured (from the construction all risks, CAR, policy) is usually taken as the sum insured for the CECR policy. However, for existing, rather than newly built, structures, setting the sum insured is particularly challenging and important. In order to avoid underinsurance, the total sum insured should not be less than the full cost of replacement (new replacement value).
Indemnification is for repair or replacement, but does not include costs for improvements, e.g. to replace with a different structure or structure with a higher capacity. The new replacement value will depend on the age of the insured property and fluctuating costs linked to area, technologies and the materials used.
It is common practice to establish a loss limit (each and every loss and/or an annual aggregate) for the material damage exposure, particularly in locations with a high natural catastrophe exposure.
Anti-selection is a major threat to a sustainable CECR portfolio. It is essential to consider that each risk is unique, necessitating a separate risk assessment and specific policy terms and conditions. Risk assessment is based on detailed technical information (including inspection reports, see below) from the insured, loss information and long-term assessment of the catastrophe exposure.
Maintenance and benefit of standardized inspections
The underwriter must be convinced that the policy is not being used as a substitute for regular maintenance and overhaul. Regular maintenance and inspections are necessary for all man-made civil engineering structures to mitigate damage or loss of function. This can present challenges to the insured on the technical and financial side, especially in a weak economic climate, but is critical. To ensure that proper maintenance is taking place, insurers establish standardized, systematic and regular inspection procedures by specialized agents (risk engineers).
An expert partner for CECR risk
Assessing and evaluating CECR risk requires underwriting and risk expertise from multiple disciplines, including engineering, geology, seismology and meteorology. PartnerRe is a global, multi-line reinsurer with long-term expertise in these functions. Our facultative engineering team has the experience and know-how to underwrite CECR and to offer this technically challenging cover to clients.
1: Cost estimates: IRC archive: http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs037/1102467289629/archive/1102628131209.html
2: Image source: http://www.chamonet.com
View 2018 Cyber Survey report. Helping you keep track of the latest market developments and challenges in this rapidly evolving and essential segment of the […]
No doubt about it, blockchain is a powerful, efficiency-enabling technology, but as Markus Bassler candidly explains, for re/insurers it’s also important to be aware of the issues and limitations, and to think carefully about where it could really add value.